Editorial News Uncategorized

An intensive care nurse shot and killed by federal forces in Minneapolis

Jacques Pj Provost

2026-06-20 22:18:01

A Dedicated Healthcare Professional

Alex Jeffrey Pretti was no ordinary person. Born in Illinois and a U.S. citizen by birth, he had chosen to devote his life to caring for others. A graduate of the University of Minnesota and a registered nurse since 2021, he worked in intensive care at the Veterans Affairs hospital in Minneapolis. His parents, who live in Wisconsin, described a son who cared deeply about people—a passionate professional who found his calling in helping the most vulnerable. His job was to care for critically ill patients, to support them through their most difficult moments, and to bring comfort and hope where others saw only suffering. It was this same compassion that had driven him to take to the streets on that fateful Saturday morning.

Alex’s colleagues and friends describe him as a kind-hearted man, deeply committed to his community. Passionate about nature and adventure, he shared his life with Joule, his Catahoula Leopard Dog, who had recently passed away—a loss that deeply affected him, according to those close to him. His record was spotless: no criminal history, just a few traffic tickets over the course of his entire life. The Minneapolis police had, in fact, identified him as a legal gun owner with a valid concealed carry permit. Yet his loved ones say they never saw him carry that weapon, highlighting the contrast between the portrait painted by the authorities and the man they knew. A neighbor interviewed by The New York Times described him as someone who was absolutely not violent.

What strikes me most about this story is the tragic banality of Alex’s fate. He could have been any one of us. A man who gets up in the morning to go to work, who loves animals, who cares about his neighbors, who participates in the life of his community. Nothing set him apart from millions of other ordinary Americans, except perhaps his willingness to step outside his comfort zone to defend what he believed in. And that is precisely what dooms him. In this America of 2026, the simple act of speaking out, protesting, or getting politically involved can cost you your life. There is something terrifying about the idea that civic engagement—which should be the foundation of any democracy—has become a high-risk activity. I can’t help but think of all the Alexes who could be the next victims if we don’t act now.

A New Form of Political Engagement

Alex Pretti’s political activism was relatively recent. According to his parents, he had begun participating in protests following the death of Renée Good, another victim of federal operations in Minneapolis, who was shot and killed on January 7, 2026, by an ICE agent. That first tragedy had shaken the community and prompted many residents, like Alex, to speak out publicly against what they perceived as an unjustified intrusion by federal forces into their city. Michael Pretti, his father, told the Associated Press that his son felt deeply troubled by what was happening in Minneapolis and across the United States with ICE, just like millions of other people.

In a conversation with his parents just two weeks before his death, Alex had been warned to exercise caution during the protests. His parents had told him to protest but not to get physically involved—essentially, not to do anything stupid. According to his father, Alex had assured them that he understood, that he knew he had to avoid any direct conflict with law enforcement. This tragic conversation reveals the awareness of the danger looming over these protests, even for peaceful citizens like Alex. Yet, despite this warning, he continued to participate—perhaps because the need to bear witness outweighed his fear, or perhaps because he never imagined that he would be the one to pay the ultimate price.

This exchange between Alex and his parents haunts me. It sums up the sheer absurdity of our times: parents who have to tell their adult son to be careful because protesting could kill him. Children who have to explain to their parents that yes, they know the risks, but they cannot remain silent. I feel as though we’re living in a world where normality has been suspended, where the basic rules of civility no longer apply. And I wonder how many similar conversations have taken place in homes across America in recent weeks, how many parents have faced this unspeakable anguish of seeing their children engage in a struggle that is not their own but is becoming inevitable. The sadness that overwhelms me is immense, but it is accompanied by a deep sense of respect for those who, despite everything, choose not to remain silent.

Section 2: A Comparison of Conflicting Accounts

The Federal Authorities’ Account

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a statement in the hours following the incident, stating that federal agents had fired defensive shots after a man armed with a 9mm semi-automatic pistol approached them and violently resisted as they attempted to disarm him. According to this account, the man in question, identified as Alex Pretti, reportedly posed an immediate threat to the agents’ safety, forcing them to use lethal force in self-defense. DHS officials emphasized that the man was carrying two additional magazines and had no identification, painting a picture of a highly dangerous situation that allegedly required a proportionate response.

To support this account, DHS released a photograph of a handgun it claimed to have recovered from the scene of the incident. According to CNN, the weapon appears to be a SIG Sauer Emperor Scorpion, a 9mm pistol. Gregory Bovino, commander of the Border Patrol, stated that the agent who shot Alex Pretti was an eight-year veteran of the Border Patrol with extensive training. This attempt to legitimize the agents’ actions is part of a broader communication strategy aimed at presenting the operation as necessary and proportionate in the face of a real threat.

Every time I hear these official explanations, I feel a mix of cynicism and despair. It has become a familiar refrain: the armed man, the imminent threat, self-defense, the agents’ impeccable training. But this time, something doesn’t add up. The videos, the eyewitness accounts—everything seems to contradict this official version. And even if, for the sake of argument, we were to assume that Alex was carrying a weapon—which is far from proven—how do we explain the disproportionate response? Why so many bullets? Why so many officers for a single man? There is a tension in this official account—a refusal to question it—that frightens me. It’s the hallmark of a system that doesn’t want to listen, that refuses to acknowledge its mistakes, that would rather sacrifice lives than admit its fallibility.

Contradictory Videos and Eyewitness Accounts

Yet, amateur videos shared on social media tell a radically different story. An analysis conducted by The New York Times examined several recordings of the incident and concluded that in the moments leading up to his death, Alex Pretti was holding a cell phone, not a firearm. The footage clearly shows the man filming the officers, his phone visible in his hand. Other videos show him helping two people before being sprayed with pepper spray by an officer, suggesting that the situation was not as tense as DHS claims. Even the Associated Press, in its detailed account of the incident, notes that no video appears to show Alex with a visible weapon.

Eyewitness accounts from people at the scene support this alternative version of events. One witness told Minnesota Public Radio that the man next to him was focused on helping people arriving on Nicollet Avenue, guiding them to slow down and cross safely. According to this account, ICE agents approached them and ordered them to step back, for no apparent reason, according to the witness. That is when the incident escalated. Several videos show an agent pushing Alex, who then clings to another person before falling. Next, about seven agents surround him; one pins him to the ground from behind while another strikes him in the chest with a cylindrical object. That is when shots rang out, killing Alex instantly.

What terrifies me most is the chasm between the official version of events and what our own eyes show us. In a modern democracy, with cameras everywhere and witnesses ready to speak out, how is it possible that the authorities can still put forward such a blatantly false account of what happened? This ability to distort reality, to deny the obvious, to turn a victim into a threat—that may be the greatest danger facing us. Because if we can no longer believe what we see, if we can no longer trust our own eyes, then anything becomes possible. Disinformation no longer comes only from outside; it has been institutionalized, integrated into the very workings of the system. And perhaps that—more than weapons—is what will ultimately kill us.

Section 3: A City Under Strain

The Context of the Protests

This tragedy occurred amid a particularly tense situation in Minneapolis. Since January 7, 2026, and the death of Renée Good, who was shot by an ICE agent, the city has been the scene of nearly daily protests against the presence of ICE and border patrols. These protests have drawn thousands of people, expressing their anger at what they perceive as the growing militarization of their city. The death of Alex Pretti, which occurred just over a kilometer from where Renée Good was killed, acted as a catalyst, transforming simmering anger into an outburst of collective rage.

Social media played a crucial role in organizing and amplifying these protest movements. Messages were shared in Signal groups, mobilizing hundreds of people in just a few minutes. According to The New York Times, residents quickly arrived at the scene of the incident after receiving alerts on these rapid-communication networks. This capacity for instant mobilization is a testament to strong community organization and a fierce determination to resist what many perceive as an occupation of their city by federal forces alien to their community.

Minneapolis has become a symbol, almost in spite of itself. George Floyd in 2020, now Renée Good and Alex Pretti in 2026. The city seems to have become the stage for a dress rehearsal of something larger, something more threatening. What strikes me is the resilience of this community, its ability to mobilize again and again despite the blows it has suffered. But I’m also worried. How far can a population be pushed before it breaks? How many funerals, how many vigils, how many tears can a city absorb before it breaks? The anger I feel rising isn’t just local—it’s national, almost global. And this anger, if it isn’t heard, will eventually find a way to express itself, one way or another.

Repression and Its Consequences

The authorities’ response to the protests following Alex Pretti’s death was brutally forceful. Federal agents used tear gas and stun grenades to disperse the crowds. At least one person was sprayed with pepper spray, and two protesters were arrested for attempting to breach police barricades. Footage shared on social media shows officers firing nonlethal projectiles at protesters, creating scenes of chaos reminiscent of the worst moments in the city’s recent history.

Faced with this escalation of violence, local authorities responded in an unprecedented manner. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz activated the National Guard to assist local police in maintaining order. This unprecedented decision underscores the gravity of the situation and the federal authorities’ inability to manage the consequences of their own operations. Even in the sports world, the repercussions were felt: the NBA game between the Minnesota Timberwolves and the Golden State Warriors, originally scheduled for the day of the incident, was postponed until the following day for security reasons—a striking illustration of the city’s paralysis.

The militarization of the police response astounds me. Tear gas canisters in the streets of Minneapolis—a city that has suffered so much, that is in such desperate need of healing. It’s as if salt were being poured into a gaping wound. I don’t understand this logic of brute force, this conviction that violence can resolve what is fundamentally a problem of trust, legitimacy, and respect. Every grenade thrown, every burst of pepper spray fired, widens the divide between the people and those who are supposed to protect them a little more. And that divide, once wide enough, becomes unbridgeable. I fear that we have already passed that point of no return, that the rift is now complete and irreversible.

Section 4: A Polarized Political Response

Reactions from Local Authorities

Reactions from local authorities were marked by an unequivocal condemnation of the federal forces’ actions. Governor Tim Walz stated on social media that the shooting was “disgusting,” calling on President Trump to “end this operation” and asserting that “Minnesota has had enough.” He also said that Minnesotans were compiling a “record of evidence” to prosecute federal agents, a statement that reveals the depth of the rift between local and federal authorities. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara, for his part, refused to leave the scene despite attempts by ICE officials to have local police evacuated.

Democratic elected officials in Minnesota also reacted strongly. Senators Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith condemned ICE’s continued presence in the state following the shooting. Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty called for the scene to be secured by local law enforcement to preserve evidence, expressing doubts about the federal authorities’ ability to conduct an impartial investigation. These statements illustrate a major institutional rift between local authorities and the federal government—a rift that threatens the very cohesion of the state apparatus.

There is something almost desperate about the firmness of the local authorities’ reactions. It is as if they were shouting into the void, knowing that their voices would not be heard, that they would change nothing. Tim Walz, Amy Klobuchar, Tina Smith—all these elected officials whom I know to be reasonable, moderate people—find themselves forced to adopt confrontational language because they have no other choice. This is the hallmark of a system that is fundamentally dysfunctional, where the usual mechanisms of consultation and cooperation have ceased to function. And I wonder what remains of a democracy when local elected officials have to resort to threatening to sue federal agents to protect their own citizens. It’s a world turned upside down—absurd and terrifying.

Reactions at the National Level

At the national level, reactions have been just as polarized. President Donald Trump was briefed on the shooting and responded by accusing Governor Walz and Mayor Jacob Frey of inciting insurrection with their criticism of ICE. This aggressive rhetoric is part of a broader strategy to criminalize any opposition to federal policies. Vice President JD Vance, for his part, blamed local authorities for ignoring ICE’s requests, attempting to shift the blame onto those who criticize federal operations rather than onto the agents who commit the acts.

Perhaps the most shocking reaction of all came from Stephen Miller, a senior White House adviser, who claimed—without a shred of evidence—that Alex Pretti was a “domestic terrorist” who had “attempted to assassinate federal law enforcement officers.” This statement, made even before any serious investigation had begun, illustrates the drift toward a rhetoric of terror used to justify any action by federal forces. The National Border Patrol Council, the union representing border patrol agents, blamed the rhetoric of politicians and the media for encouraging these “reckless confrontations and attacks against our agents and officers,” refusing to question the methods employed.

These national reactions make me sick to my stomach. Stephen Miller labeling an American citizen a domestic terrorist without a shred of evidence is dystopian science fiction come to life. This is the language of dictatorships, not democracies. And Trump accusing democratically elected officials of insurrection for criticizing his policies is the height of cynicism. I realize with horror that we have entered an era where words have lost their meaning, where “terrorist” can be applied to anyone, where “insurrection” can refer to legitimate criticism. This corruption of language, this exploitation of fear, is perhaps the greatest danger facing us. Because when words no longer mean anything, when they serve only to manipulate, then anything becomes possible—including the unthinkable.

Section 5: An Investigation Under Pressure

Obstacles to the Investigation

The investigation into Alex Pretti’s death immediately ran into major obstacles. According to several accounts, DHS officials attempted to prevent local police from accessing the crime scene—a decision that Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara refused to accept. This obstruction of the investigation raises serious questions about the independence and impartiality of the federal investigation. Mary Moriarty, the Hennepin County Attorney, expressed concerns about the preservation of evidence, calling for the scene to be secured by local law enforcement.

Hours after the shooting, three FBI armored vehicles appeared at the scene of the incident—a militarized presence that only heightened tensions in a city already in shock. These developments suggest a desire on the part of federal authorities to control the narrative and the investigation, limiting transparency and accountability. The central question of whether or not a weapon was present at the scene remains unresolved, with federal authorities claiming to have recovered one while videos appear to show Alex Pretti holding only a cell phone.

What strikes me about this investigation is the total lack of trust. Federal authorities do not trust the local police to do their job, and the local police do not trust federal authorities not to tamper with the evidence. It is a Kafkaesque situation where each side suspects the other of malicious intent, where the truth becomes a hostage in a bureaucratic war. And in the midst of it all is Alex’s family, who just want to understand what happened, who just want to know why their son died. This lack of institutional trust strikes me as the most troubling symptom of the crisis we are facing. Without trust, there can be no justice. Without justice, there can be no peace. And without peace, there can be no future.

The Stakes of the Investigation

The investigation into Alex Pretti’s death is of crucial importance for the future of relations between federal and local authorities, as well as for the legitimacy of ICE operations within U.S. territory. If the investigation confirms that the agents acted in an excessive or unjustified manner, it could trigger an unprecedented wave of scrutiny regarding the use of federal forces for domestic law enforcement operations. Conversely, if the investigation exonerates the agents, it risks widening the divide between local communities and the federal government, fueling a sense of impunity that could lead to even more violence.

Local authorities in Minnesota have made it clear that they would not trust a purely federal investigation. Governor Tim Walz stated that Minnesotans were compiling a record of evidence to prosecute federal agents, suggesting a potential prosecution separate from the federal investigation. This unprecedented situation could set a major legal precedent regarding jurisdiction and accountability when federal agents intervene within a local jurisdiction. The consequences of this case could be felt far beyond Minnesota, affecting the balance of power among the different levels of the U.S. government.

I feel that we are at a historic tipping point. This investigation into the death of Alex Pretti is not just an investigation into an isolated incident; it is a test for our entire democracy. Can federal agents kill American citizens on the street and never be held accountable for their actions? Do local authorities have the right to protect their own citizens from federal forces they deem abusive? These questions touch on the very foundation of our social contract—the idea that government exists to protect citizens, not to wage war against them. I fear that the answer to these questions will reflect back to us a distorted image of who we thought we were—a broken mirror showing us a society we no longer recognize.

Section 6: A Man, a City, a Nation in Mourning

The Community in Mourning

Since Alex Pretti’s death, the Minneapolis community has been in mourning. Vigils have been held, candles lit, and speeches given. Residents of the surrounding neighborhoods have opened their doors to protesters, offering coffee and shelter from the cold. Restaurants along the street where the incident occurred have done the same, transforming places of business into spaces of solidarity. These simple yet powerful gestures demonstrate a capacity for resilience and mutual support that stands in stark contrast to the violence of law enforcement.

Alex’s colleagues at the Department of Veterans Affairs expressed their shock and grief. To them, Alex was not a political activist or a threat; he was a dedicated colleague, a caring friend, and a skilled professional who had chosen to devote his life to caring for others. This disconnect between the man they knew and the portrait painted by federal authorities inflicts further pain on those who must now mourn a friend while seeing his name linked to baseless accusations. The medical community as a whole has expressed its solidarity, emphasizing that the death of a healthcare worker exercising his right to protest constitutes an attack on the entire profession.

These stories of grief touch me deeply. I imagine these colleagues, these friends, these patients who have lost a guardian angel. I imagine these informal gatherings in hospital hallways, these tears shed discreetly in break rooms, these lost gazes wondering how this could have happened. What strikes me is that even in the midst of grief, there is this ability to come together as a community, to help one another, to resist. Restaurants opening their doors, neighbors offering coffee, strangers gathering to keep vigil together. Perhaps this, in the end, is what will save us. Not institutions, not courts, not politicians. But this ordinary, yet extraordinary, ability to recognize one another as human beings, to share in the pain, to refuse isolation. It is in these simple gestures that I find a ray of hope in this tunnel of darkness.

A Country Looking in the Mirror

The death of Alex Pretti forces all of America to look in the mirror. This is not just a story about Minneapolis; it is a story about America in 2026—about what it has become and what it wants to be. Through this tragic lens, the deep divisions within American society are revealed in all their cruelty. On one side are those who see federal operations as necessary to maintain order and security. On the other are those who perceive these same operations as an existential threat to civil liberties and human dignity.

National and international media have extensively covered the incident, analyzing its implications for the future of American democracy. Some see it as a harbinger of irreparable polarization; others, as the awakening of a new consciousness that could lead to profound change. Whatever the interpretation, one thing is certain: Alex Pretti’s death has changed something. It marked a point of no return, a moment when America had to confront a truth it had perhaps refused to admit for too long: that the use of state violence against its own citizens is not an anomaly, but a reality that has become commonplace.

I look at this country that I love, this country where I was born, and sometimes I no longer recognize it. It is as if we have become strangers to ourselves, as if something has broken within our collective soul. Alex Pretti’s death is merely a symptom of a deeper illness—the illness that drives us to see the enemy everywhere, even in our own fellow citizens. And I wonder what it will take for us to heal—how many more Alexes will have to die before we realize that we’re all in the same boat, that the violence we inflict on others will always come back to haunt us. I still have hope—just a tiny bit—the hope that perhaps, just perhaps, this tragedy will be the wake-up call we need to snap out of it before it’s too late.

Section 7: Implications for the Future

The Implications for Federal Policies

Alex Pretti’s death could have major implications for federal immigration and law enforcement policies. Already, several Democratic senators have announced that they would vote against any bill funding the DHS that includes funding for ICE. Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen, both from Nevada, have joined this opposition, signaling a potential rift within the Democratic Party itself on this crucial issue. Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii has also declared his opposition to a DHS funding bill, citing the shooting as the reason for his stance.

This growing opposition could lead to a new budget crisis, with the risk of another partial federal government shutdown if an agreement is not reached. The issue of federal agents’ accountability is also at the heart of the debate, with growing calls for reform of oversight and accountability mechanisms. Some are calling for the creation of independent commissions to investigate alleged abuses, while others are demanding more sweeping reforms of the federal justice system. Whatever solutions are proposed, one thing is clear: the status quo is no longer tenable.

What strikes me about this political story is the appalling slowness of the response. It took a death for politicians to start asking the questions they should have been asking long ago. Why are federal agents operating in cities against the will of local authorities? Why are there no effective accountability mechanisms? Why are American citizens treated like enemies on their own soil? These questions should have been at the heart of public debate for years, but they have been pushed aside, marginalized, and ignored. Now they’re coming back to haunt us, and I fear the response won’t match the urgency of the situation. Politics always seems to lag behind reality, and that delay costs lives.

The Role of Civil Society

In the face of this crisis, American civil society has mobilized as rarely before. Civil rights organizations have organized protests, fundraisers, and awareness campaigns. Volunteer lawyers have stepped forward to help the victims’ families. Artists have created commemorative works. Religious leaders have delivered sermons on justice and peace. This massive mobilization is a testament to a vibrant civic consciousness and a refusal to give in to fear and resignation.

However, this mobilization faces significant obstacles. State repression, disinformation, and political polarization make the task difficult for those seeking to build a unified and effective movement. Internal divisions within progressive communities themselves further complicate matters. Yet, despite these obstacles, something is taking shape—something new and potentially transformative. Alex Pretti’s death has catalyzed a latent energy, giving it new direction and urgency. It remains to be seen whether this energy can transform into a genuine movement for lasting change.

I am both inspired and concerned by this mobilization of civil society. Inspired because I see ordinary people doing extraordinary things—standing up, speaking out, and risking their comfort to defend their convictions. Concerned because I know how fragile these movements can be, how easily they can be infiltrated, co-opted, or destroyed. But above all, I wonder what else it will take. How many more victims, how many more tragedies will have to occur before this movement becomes the irresistible force we need? I feel that we are at a pivotal moment, that the decisions we make now, the choices we make, will determine the fate of this country for generations to come. The weight of this responsibility sometimes feels almost overwhelming to me.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

The Duty to Remember

Alex Pretti’s death must not be forgotten. It must be etched into this country’s collective memory as a warning, as a testament to the dangers of state violence and impunity. We have a duty to remember who he was, what he believed in, and what was taken from him. This duty to remember is not merely an act of respect for a dead man; it is an act of resistance against those who would erase his story and reduce his death to an anonymous statistic.

We will remember Alex as a man who loved others, who devoted himself to caring for them, and who had the courage of his convictions. We will remember that he was a healthcare professional, that he saved lives, and that he contributed to his community. Above all, we will remember that he was a human being, with his strengths and weaknesses, his hopes and dreams—a human being who deserved to live, to love, and to be loved. And we will remember that his death was not inevitable, that it was not necessary, that it was the result of political and human choices that could have been different.

When I think about this duty to remember, I think of all those other lives that have been lost, all those other names that have been forgotten. George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Renée Good, and now Alex Pretti. A litany of names added to a list that is already far too long. And I wonder how many more names we’ll add before we stop forgetting. What frightens me is that we’ll end up getting used to death, accepting it as the price we have to pay for something—but for what, exactly? For security? For order? For what, exactly? And I refuse to accept this resignation. I refuse to accept that Alex’s death is just another line in a dark history book. I want to believe that his death can have meaning, that his sacrifice can serve something greater than himself.

The Call to Action

The duty to remember is not enough. We must act, now, before it’s too late. We must demand answers, we must demand accountability, we must expose the truth, whatever it may be. We must support the victims’ families, the affected communities, and the organizations fighting for justice. We must participate in public debates, vote, protest, write, speak out, and refuse to remain silent or complicit.

Above all, we must reflect on what kind of society we want to be. Do we want to be a country where federal agents can kill citizens with impunity? Do we want to be a country where the right to protest can cost you your life? Do we want to be a country where violence is the answer to every disagreement? If the answer to these questions is no, then we must act now. We must build a new vision for America—one grounded in justice, peace, and mutual respect. It won’t be easy; it won’t happen quickly—but it is the only way to honor the memory of Alex and all the others.

I end this article with a heavy heart but with hope intact. Alex Pretti’s death broke my heart, but it also ignited something within me—a certainty that we cannot go on like this, that we must change, that we must become better. I don’t know exactly how, I don’t know exactly when, but I know that this change is necessary, urgent, vital. Alex Pretti did not die in vain. He died to remind us that democracy is not a given, that it must be defended every day, that it demands courage, vigilance, and commitment from us. And it is this commitment that I make today, in Alex’s name, in the name of all the others—to never forget, to never stop fighting, to never give up hope for a better world. This is the promise I make to him; it is the promise we must all make to ourselves if we are to survive these dark times.

Sources

Primary sources

CBS News, “Man fatally shot by federal officer in Minnesota worked as an ICU nurse, his parents say,” January 24, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alex-jeffrey-pretti-shot-killed-minnesota/

Associated Press, “Man is shot and killed during Minneapolis immigration crackdown, National Guard activated,” January 24, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/immigration-enforcement-minnesota-4d1499fc5962ab880f3816259e04bdbf

Associated Press, Live updates: Minneapolis National Guard activated after Border Patrol agent kills man, January 24, 2026, https://apnews.com/live/minneapolis-ice-shooting-updates-1-24-2026

Wikipedia, Killing of Alex Pretti, accessed January 24, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Alex_Pretti

Secondary sources

The New York Times, Federal Officers Shoot Person in Minneapolis, January 24, 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/24/us/minneapolis-shooting-ice

The New York Times, “Videos Show Moments in Which Agents Killed a Man in Minneapolis,” January 24, 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/24/us/minneapolis-shooting-federal-agents-video.html

CNN, Trump aide claims man shot in Minneapolis was a domestic terrorist before investigation plays out, January 24, 2026, https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/ice-minneapolis-shooting-01-24-26

Star Tribune, “Third shooting by a federal agent reported in Minneapolis in less than three weeks,” January 24, 2026, https://www.startribune.com/ice-raids-minnesota/601546426

Bring Me The News, “Videos show moment ICE agent shoots man in south Minneapolis,” January 24, 2026, https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-news/videos-show-moment-ice-agent-shoots-man-in-south-minneapolis

This content was created with the help of AI.

Commentaires

0 0 votes

Article Rating