Skip to content

20 billion dollars—three aircraft carriers or one battleship?

The first shock with the Trump-class battleship is its price: $20 billion per unit. An astronomical sum, which alone accounts for nearly 10% of the U.S. Department of Defense’s annual budget. By comparison, the latest Ford-class aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, cost “only” $13 billion. For the same price as two Trump-class battleships, the U.S. Navy could have acquired three aircraft carriers, or dozens of frigates and nuclear submarines. “It’s a questionable strategic choice,” says a Democratic senator, who denounces “an unprecedented waste of public funds for the sake of a vanity project.”

Critics are quick to point out that this astronomical cost does not take operating expenses into account. According to a study by the Government Accountability Office, the Trump-class battleship will cost $1 billion per year in maintenance and personnel, far more than existing ships. “At that price, we could modernize the entire destroyer fleet,” says a defense budget expert indignantly. Worse still: cost overruns keep piling up. The electromagnetic shield, touted as revolutionary, is already two years behind schedule and has seen its budget balloon by 30 percent. As for the underwater drones, their development has been entrusted to companies with close ties to the administration, sparking accusations of favoritism.

In response to this criticism, the Pentagon counters that the Trump-class battleship is “an investment for the next fifty years.” “We’re talking about a platform capable of dominating all theaters of operations, from the South China Sea to the Arctic,” argues an admiral. Yet skeptics point out that military history is rife with examples of “invincible” ships rendered obsolete within a few years by technological advances. “In 1941, the battleship was the king of the seas. By 1945, it had already been surpassed by aircraft carriers and aviation,” recalls a naval historian. So why repeat the same mistakes? Why invest billions in a ship designed for a war that no longer exists?


Twenty billion dollars. Twenty billion! For a single ship. For a single symbol. For a single act of folly. And meanwhile, we’re told that America can’t afford to care for its sick, educate its children, or house its homeless. We’re told we need to tighten our belts, make choices, and set priorities. But apparently not when it comes to building a giant battleship to stroke a president’s ego.

What strikes me is the absurdity of the situation. We live in the age of drones, cyberattacks, and hypersonic missiles, and we’re spending a fortune on a ship that looks like a relic of the 20th century. A ship that, by the way, will be an ideal target for the Chinese. A $20 billion target, no less. And we’re supposed to believe that this is what modernity looks like? That this is strategy? That this is security?

No. The truth is that this battleship isn’t a weapon. It’s a whim. A $20 billion whim, paid for by taxpayers, justified by hollow arguments, and defended by generals who know full well that it will serve no purpose. Because real war, today, isn’t won with battleships. It’s won with ideas. With intelligence. With alliances. Not with steel monsters that serve only to impress the crowd. And that is a betrayal. A betrayal of public funds. A betrayal of reason. A betrayal of the future.

Sources

– “20-Billion-Dollar Bomb Magnet? Why Critics Are Trashing the New Trump-Class Battleship,” 19FortyFive, February 8, 2026.
– “The Trump-Class Battleship: A Waste of Money or a Game-Changer?”, Defense News, February 5, 2026.
– “Why the Navy’s New $20 Billion Battleship Could Be a Disaster”, The National Interest, February 6, 2026.
– “The Trump-Class Battleship: A Symbol of American Power or a Strategic Blunder?”, Foreign Policy, February 7, 2026.
– “Critics Slam $20 Billion Trump-Class Battleship as ‘Wasteful’ and ‘Vulnerable’”, Military.com, February 4, 2026.
– “The Trump-Class Battleship: A Technological Marvel or a White Elephant?”, Popular Mechanics, February 3, 2026.
– “The Navy’s New Battleship Is a $20 Billion Gamble”, The Atlantic, February 8, 2026.
– “The Trump-Class Battleship: A Boondoggle or a Breakthrough?”, Bloomberg, February 5, 2026.
– “Why the Trump-Class Battleship Is a Terrible Idea,” Business Insider, February 6, 2026.
– “The Trump-Class Battleship: A Monument to American Hubris,” The Guardian, February 7, 2026.
– “The Navy’s New $20 Billion Battleship Is a ‘Floating Target’,” Forbes, February 4, 2026.
– “The Trump-Class Battleship: A Strategic Mistake or a Necessary Deterrent?,” War on the Rocks, February 8, 2026.

This content was created with the help of AI.

facebook icon twitter icon linkedin icon
Copied!

Commentaires

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
More Content